<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Schooling Children Out Of the Gene Pool</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sunsyncnutrition.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1205" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sunsyncnutrition.com/blog/?p=1205</link>
	<description>SunSync Nutrition</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 21:18:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.15</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sunsync Nutrition</title>
		<link>https://www.sunsyncnutrition.com/blog/?p=1205&#038;cpage=1#comment-5175</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sunsync Nutrition]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2016 19:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sunsyncnutrition.com/blog/?p=1205#comment-5175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Taylor Gatto (The Underground History of American Education, Revised Edition, 2006) wrote ...
 
&quot;Did the abstract and rather arcane discipline of Bionomics have any effect on real life? Well, consider this: the first formal legislation making forced sterilization a legal act on planet Earth was passed, not in Germany or Japan, but in the American state of Indiana, a law which became official in the famous 1927 Supreme Court test case Buck vs. Bell. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote the majority opinion allowing seventeen-year-old Carrie Buck to be sterilized against her will to prevent her &#039;degenerate offspring,&#039; in Holmes&#039; words, from being born. Twenty years after the momentous decision, in the trial of German doctors at Nuremberg, Nazi physicians testified that their precedents were American — aimed at combating racial degeneracy. The German name for forced sterilization was &#039;the Indiana Procedure.&#039;

&quot;To say this bionomical spirit infected public schooling is only to say birds fly. Once you know it&#039;s there, the principle jumps out at you from behind every school bush. It suffused public discourse in many areas where it had claimed superior insight. Walter Lippmann, in 1922, demanded &#039;severe restrictions on public debate,&#039; in light of the allegedly enormous number of feeble-minded Americans. The old ideal of participatory democracy was insane, according to Lippmann.&quot;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XaO7Ms55Dn0]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Taylor Gatto (The Underground History of American Education, Revised Edition, 2006) wrote &#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Did the abstract and rather arcane discipline of Bionomics have any effect on real life? Well, consider this: the first formal legislation making forced sterilization a legal act on planet Earth was passed, not in Germany or Japan, but in the American state of Indiana, a law which became official in the famous 1927 Supreme Court test case Buck vs. Bell. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote the majority opinion allowing seventeen-year-old Carrie Buck to be sterilized against her will to prevent her &#8216;degenerate offspring,&#8217; in Holmes&#8217; words, from being born. Twenty years after the momentous decision, in the trial of German doctors at Nuremberg, Nazi physicians testified that their precedents were American — aimed at combating racial degeneracy. The German name for forced sterilization was &#8216;the Indiana Procedure.&#8217;</p>
<p>&#8220;To say this bionomical spirit infected public schooling is only to say birds fly. Once you know it&#8217;s there, the principle jumps out at you from behind every school bush. It suffused public discourse in many areas where it had claimed superior insight. Walter Lippmann, in 1922, demanded &#8216;severe restrictions on public debate,&#8217; in light of the allegedly enormous number of feeble-minded Americans. The old ideal of participatory democracy was insane, according to Lippmann.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XaO7Ms55Dn0" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XaO7Ms55Dn0</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sunsync Nutrition</title>
		<link>https://www.sunsyncnutrition.com/blog/?p=1205&#038;cpage=1#comment-5174</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sunsync Nutrition]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2016 17:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sunsyncnutrition.com/blog/?p=1205#comment-5174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d consider being a Libertarian, but they wear neckties.

Exceptions to this rule are John Taylor Gatto and the brothel-owner Libertarians of Nevada (no relationship implied).

Neckties are only-too-obvious phallic symbols, but do they represent domesticated phallic symbols or feral ones?

Jodi Balkan (&quot;Tie Me Up. Tie Me Down,&quot; Psychology Today, Feb. 1, 1997) wrote …

&quot;With 60 percent of ties being purchased by women, many men are the Charley McCarthys of the fit-to-be-tied fashion statement.

&quot;Of course, there are those who will swear that a long, wide tie with silk that feels like &#039;living skin&#039; is really just representative of the male genitalia. &#039;The tie is the most obvious kind of a phallic symbol,&#039; says George D. Goldman, Ph.D., a psychologist and psychoanalyst who practices in New York City. &#039;It hangs down in front of a man like a phallic symbol — but that&#039;s just a cliché.

&quot;&#039;Like Sigmund Freud once said, &quot;Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.&quot; And some ties are just ties.&#039; But just in case, women are glad that those lanky, skinny ties are out of style.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d consider being a Libertarian, but they wear neckties.</p>
<p>Exceptions to this rule are John Taylor Gatto and the brothel-owner Libertarians of Nevada (no relationship implied).</p>
<p>Neckties are only-too-obvious phallic symbols, but do they represent domesticated phallic symbols or feral ones?</p>
<p>Jodi Balkan (&#8220;Tie Me Up. Tie Me Down,&#8221; Psychology Today, Feb. 1, 1997) wrote …</p>
<p>&#8220;With 60 percent of ties being purchased by women, many men are the Charley McCarthys of the fit-to-be-tied fashion statement.</p>
<p>&#8220;Of course, there are those who will swear that a long, wide tie with silk that feels like &#8216;living skin&#8217; is really just representative of the male genitalia. &#8216;The tie is the most obvious kind of a phallic symbol,&#8217; says George D. Goldman, Ph.D., a psychologist and psychoanalyst who practices in New York City. &#8216;It hangs down in front of a man like a phallic symbol — but that&#8217;s just a cliché.</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8216;Like Sigmund Freud once said, &#8220;Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.&#8221; And some ties are just ties.&#8217; But just in case, women are glad that those lanky, skinny ties are out of style.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sunsync Nutrition</title>
		<link>https://www.sunsyncnutrition.com/blog/?p=1205&#038;cpage=1#comment-5173</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sunsync Nutrition]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2016 16:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sunsyncnutrition.com/blog/?p=1205#comment-5173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Swami Nitty-Gritty ...

&quot;Guilt is self-guile.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Swami Nitty-Gritty &#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Guilt is self-guile.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sunsync Nutrition</title>
		<link>https://www.sunsyncnutrition.com/blog/?p=1205&#038;cpage=1#comment-5172</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sunsync Nutrition]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2016 16:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sunsyncnutrition.com/blog/?p=1205#comment-5172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael Parenti (History as Mystery, 1999) wrote ...
 
&quot;Those who preside over our educational institutions generally are fully cognizant of their ideological responsibilities, though they may never describe them as ideological. Bored, uninformed students are a small price to pay in order to better secure cultural orthodoxy and politico-economic hegemony. Under such arrangements, real history is among the first casualties.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Parenti (History as Mystery, 1999) wrote &#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Those who preside over our educational institutions generally are fully cognizant of their ideological responsibilities, though they may never describe them as ideological. Bored, uninformed students are a small price to pay in order to better secure cultural orthodoxy and politico-economic hegemony. Under such arrangements, real history is among the first casualties.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
