<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Menstruating From Various Body Parts</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sunsyncnutrition.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1264" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sunsyncnutrition.com/blog/?p=1264</link>
	<description>SunSync Nutrition</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 21:18:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.15</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sunsync Nutrition</title>
		<link>https://www.sunsyncnutrition.com/blog/?p=1264&#038;cpage=1#comment-5214</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sunsync Nutrition]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2016 03:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sunsyncnutrition.com/blog/?p=1264#comment-5214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[George M. Gould, M.D., &amp; Walter L. Pyle, M.D. (Anomalies and Curiosities of Medicine, 1898) wrote ...

&quot;It is noteworthy that in old-time medical literature — sadly and unjustly neglected in our rage for the new —  should so often be found parallels of our most wonderful and peculiar modern cases. We wish, also, to enter a mild protest against the modern egotism that would set aside with a sneer as myth and fancy the testimonies and reports of philosophers and physicians, only because they lived hundreds of years ago. We are keenly appreciative of the power exercised by the myth-making faculty in the past, but as applied to early physicians, we suggest that the suspicion may easily be too active.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George M. Gould, M.D., &#038; Walter L. Pyle, M.D. (Anomalies and Curiosities of Medicine, 1898) wrote &#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;It is noteworthy that in old-time medical literature — sadly and unjustly neglected in our rage for the new —  should so often be found parallels of our most wonderful and peculiar modern cases. We wish, also, to enter a mild protest against the modern egotism that would set aside with a sneer as myth and fancy the testimonies and reports of philosophers and physicians, only because they lived hundreds of years ago. We are keenly appreciative of the power exercised by the myth-making faculty in the past, but as applied to early physicians, we suggest that the suspicion may easily be too active.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
