<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Krill &amp; Fish Oils Versus the Adrenal Glands</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sunsyncnutrition.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=382" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sunsyncnutrition.com/blog/?p=382</link>
	<description>SunSync Nutrition</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 22:27:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.15</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sunsync Nutrition</title>
		<link>https://www.sunsyncnutrition.com/blog/?p=382&#038;cpage=1#comment-4463</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sunsync Nutrition]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2015 17:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sunsyncnutrition.com/blog/?p=382#comment-4463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re: Nice blog post, though I must say, one study and opinion by Emanuel Revici that even specifically relates to adrenal fatigue is really not convincing enough to draw an objective conclusion that fish oils are unhealthy, especially when contrasted against the seemingly thousands of smaller and larger controlled studies that suggest otherwise.

It&#039;s a classic case of Cosmic Humor.
 
Dr. Emanuel Revici is the researcher who pointed out the benefits of fish oils in the first place.

Every single one of those studies is based on his pioneering research.

The Tesla of Medicine has been &quot;deleted&quot; from medical history without so much as a Wikipedia page.

But pharmaceutical companies ignored his caveats and adopted a &quot;one size fits all&quot; approach to peddle their goods to a gullible public..

There are many opposing studies if you know where to look.

I&#039;ll be posting another blog entry or two or even three on the subject in the very near future. :)

Know the source! Follow the money!

Re: which form (vegetarian source) and at what time do you take it?

It depends on the vegetable.

What&#039;s it&#039;s source and is it extracted with ethanol or acetone?

Most fish oil is manufactured by biotechnology.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neptune_Technologies_%26_Bioressources
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Nice blog post, though I must say, one study and opinion by Emanuel Revici that even specifically relates to adrenal fatigue is really not convincing enough to draw an objective conclusion that fish oils are unhealthy, especially when contrasted against the seemingly thousands of smaller and larger controlled studies that suggest otherwise.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a classic case of Cosmic Humor.</p>
<p>Dr. Emanuel Revici is the researcher who pointed out the benefits of fish oils in the first place.</p>
<p>Every single one of those studies is based on his pioneering research.</p>
<p>The Tesla of Medicine has been &#8220;deleted&#8221; from medical history without so much as a Wikipedia page.</p>
<p>But pharmaceutical companies ignored his caveats and adopted a &#8220;one size fits all&#8221; approach to peddle their goods to a gullible public..</p>
<p>There are many opposing studies if you know where to look.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be posting another blog entry or two or even three on the subject in the very near future. <img src="https://www.sunsyncnutrition.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /> </p>
<p>Know the source! Follow the money!</p>
<p>Re: which form (vegetarian source) and at what time do you take it?</p>
<p>It depends on the vegetable.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s it&#8217;s source and is it extracted with ethanol or acetone?</p>
<p>Most fish oil is manufactured by biotechnology.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neptune_Technologies_%26_Bioressources" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neptune_Technologies_%26_Bioressources</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sunsync Nutrition</title>
		<link>https://www.sunsyncnutrition.com/blog/?p=382&#038;cpage=1#comment-4462</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sunsync Nutrition]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 22:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sunsyncnutrition.com/blog/?p=382#comment-4462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Norman Salem &amp; Connye N. Kuratko (&quot;A reexamination of krill oil bioavailability studies,&quot; Lipids in Health and Disease, 2014) wrote ...

&quot;It has proven difficult to compare the bioavailability of krill oil (KO) vs. fish oil (FO) due to several of the characteristics of KO. These include the lower concentration of the active ingredients, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, 20:5n-3) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, 22:6n3), in KO as well as differences in their ratio relative to FO as well as the red color due to astaxanthin. In addition, the lipid classes in which EPA and DHA are found are quite different with KO containing phospholipid, di- and tri-glycerides as well as non-esterified fatty acid forms and with FO being primarily triglycerides. No human study has yet been performed that matches the dose of EPA and DHA in a randomized, controlled trial with measures of bloodstream EPA and DHA content. However, several claims have been made suggesting greater bioavailability of KO vs. FO. These have largely been based on a statistical argument where a somewhat lower dose of KO has been used to result in a similar bloodstream level of EPA and/or DHA or their total. However, the magnitude of the dosage differential is shown to be too small to be expected to result in differing blood levels of the long chain n-3 PUFAs. Some studies which have claimed to provide equal doses of KO and FO have actually used differing amounts of the two major n-3 fatty acid constituents. It is concluded that there is at present no evidence for greater bioavailability of KO vs. FO and that more carefully controlled human trials must be performed to establish their relative efficacies after chronic administration.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Norman Salem &#038; Connye N. Kuratko (&#8220;A reexamination of krill oil bioavailability studies,&#8221; Lipids in Health and Disease, 2014) wrote &#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;It has proven difficult to compare the bioavailability of krill oil (KO) vs. fish oil (FO) due to several of the characteristics of KO. These include the lower concentration of the active ingredients, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, 20:5n-3) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, 22:6n3), in KO as well as differences in their ratio relative to FO as well as the red color due to astaxanthin. In addition, the lipid classes in which EPA and DHA are found are quite different with KO containing phospholipid, di- and tri-glycerides as well as non-esterified fatty acid forms and with FO being primarily triglycerides. No human study has yet been performed that matches the dose of EPA and DHA in a randomized, controlled trial with measures of bloodstream EPA and DHA content. However, several claims have been made suggesting greater bioavailability of KO vs. FO. These have largely been based on a statistical argument where a somewhat lower dose of KO has been used to result in a similar bloodstream level of EPA and/or DHA or their total. However, the magnitude of the dosage differential is shown to be too small to be expected to result in differing blood levels of the long chain n-3 PUFAs. Some studies which have claimed to provide equal doses of KO and FO have actually used differing amounts of the two major n-3 fatty acid constituents. It is concluded that there is at present no evidence for greater bioavailability of KO vs. FO and that more carefully controlled human trials must be performed to establish their relative efficacies after chronic administration.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
