<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Medical Amnesia / Trophoblastic Theory Of Cancer #8</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sunsyncnutrition.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=649" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sunsyncnutrition.com/blog/?p=649</link>
	<description>SunSync Nutrition</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 20:25:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.15</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sunsync Nutrition</title>
		<link>https://www.sunsyncnutrition.com/blog/?p=649&#038;cpage=1#comment-4669</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sunsync Nutrition]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 22:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sunsyncnutrition.com/blog/?p=649#comment-4669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Beard, D.Sc. (The Enzyme Treatment of Cancer and Its Scientific Basis: Being Collected Papers Dealing with the Origin, Nature, and Scientific Treatment of the Natural Phenomenon Known as Malignant Disease, 1911) wrote … 

&quot;Particular attention may be directed to the following: The scientific treatment of cancer or malignant disease advocated by me is not, and it never was, a &#039;trypsin treatment.&#039; From the days of its first annunciation — December 13, 1904, and January 20, 1905 — it was meant to be of injections of &#039;the secretion of that important digestive gland, the pancreas&#039; — that is to say of pancreatic ferments, including both trypsin and amylopsin. I lay no claim whatever to having &#039;discovered&#039; such a scientific absurdity as that &#039;trypsin dissolved glycogen&#039; — as water also does — or the equally ridiculous one that it was a &#039;property [of trypsin] without doubt of breaking up glycogen in living tissues&#039; (The Hospital, January 26, 1907, page 297). I do not, and have not &#039;suggested&#039; the use of secretin, erepsin, or enterokinase, along with one or both of the pancreatic ferments mentioned above, just as little as that of soap or chain turpentine. I deal in science, not in domestic commodities. None of these are in conformity with the enzyme treatment of cancer.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Beard, D.Sc. (The Enzyme Treatment of Cancer and Its Scientific Basis: Being Collected Papers Dealing with the Origin, Nature, and Scientific Treatment of the Natural Phenomenon Known as Malignant Disease, 1911) wrote … </p>
<p>&#8220;Particular attention may be directed to the following: The scientific treatment of cancer or malignant disease advocated by me is not, and it never was, a &#8216;trypsin treatment.&#8217; From the days of its first annunciation — December 13, 1904, and January 20, 1905 — it was meant to be of injections of &#8216;the secretion of that important digestive gland, the pancreas&#8217; — that is to say of pancreatic ferments, including both trypsin and amylopsin. I lay no claim whatever to having &#8216;discovered&#8217; such a scientific absurdity as that &#8216;trypsin dissolved glycogen&#8217; — as water also does — or the equally ridiculous one that it was a &#8216;property [of trypsin] without doubt of breaking up glycogen in living tissues&#8217; (The Hospital, January 26, 1907, page 297). I do not, and have not &#8216;suggested&#8217; the use of secretin, erepsin, or enterokinase, along with one or both of the pancreatic ferments mentioned above, just as little as that of soap or chain turpentine. I deal in science, not in domestic commodities. None of these are in conformity with the enzyme treatment of cancer.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
